Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Harman v. Forssenius
Harman v. Forssenius, 379 U.S. 987 (1965)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1965-01-25
- Topic
- general
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. (Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 810.) The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in the oral argument, as amicus curiae, is granted and fiftéen minutes are-allotted for that purpose. Counsel for the appellants are allotted an additional fifteen minutes for oral argument. The motion of the appellants to strike the brief, as amicus curiae, of the Solicitor General is denied. Counsel for the appellants are allowed thirty days from the date of service to file a reply to the brief of the Solicitor General.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Harman v. Forssenius. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. (Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 810.) The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in the oral argument, as amicus curiae, is granted and fiftéen minutes are-allotted for that purpose. Counsel for the appellants are allotted an additional fifteen minutes for oral argument. The motion of the appellants to strike the brief, as amicus curiae, of the Solicitor General is denied. Counsel for the appellants are allowed thirty days from the date of service to file a reply to the brief of the Solicitor General.