Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Courtesy Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. Port of New York Authority
Courtesy Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. Port of N.Y. Auth., 375 U.S. 78 (1963)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1963-11-12
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Courtesy Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. Port of New York Authority. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
COURTESY SANDWICH SHOP, INC., ET AL.
v.
PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY ET AL.
No. 399.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided November 12, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.Edward S. Greenbaum, Morris L. Ernst, Leo Rosen, W. Bernard Richland and Jerome M. Alper for appellants.
Sidney Goldstein and Daniel B. Goldberg for appellees.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for intervenor-appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.