Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
United States v. Continental Can Co.
United States v. Cont’l Can Co., 375 U.S. 893 (1963)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1963-10-28
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that an individual’s pointing to a written list fell within the hearsay rule, since this act was “as much a communication as a statement that ‘This is a list of the names and numbers of the salesmen’ ” implicated in the securities fraud case would have been
- pointing of finger held to be a statement for purposes of hearsay rule
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Continental Can Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 73 opinions
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Probable jurisdiction noted.