Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Krock v. Electric Motor & Repair Co.

377 U.S. 934

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1964-05-18
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • taking the position that abstention is proper due solely to the difficulty of the state law question
  • 'Glidden, whose effective life was short, has proven to be, under sound law, an unsafe guide and a dim beacon'
  • "[W]here litigants have once battled for the court's decision, they should neither be required, nor without good reason permitted, to battle for it again."
  • "the `law of the case' does not rigidly bind a court to its former decisions, but is only addressed to its good sense"
  • government had right to appeal trial court's suppression order in earlier, aborted prosecution
  • “ ‘Finality’ ... may mean little more than that the litigation of a particular issue has reached such a stage that a court sees no really good reason for permitting it to be litigated again.”
  • decision stayed until state court ruled on area of unclear state law
  • an appeal is to be determined upon the record below

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Krock v. Electric Motor & Repair Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
274 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.