Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Head v. California
Head v. Cal., 374 U.S. 509 (1963)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1963-06-17
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- treating petition for common-law certiorari as one for statutory certiorari
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Head v. California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
HEAD
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 872, Misc.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 17, 1963. ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI.Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and A. Wallace Tashima, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted but the motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.