Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Regalado v. California

374 U.S. 497

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1963-06-17
Topic: general

374 U.S. 497 (1963) REGALADO v. CALIFORNIA ET AL. No. 10, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 17, 1963.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Regalado v. California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 5 opinions

374 U.S. 497 (1963)

REGALADO
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.

No. 10, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 17, 1963. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Clark Moore, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Ker v. California, ante, p. 23, and McDonald v. United States, 335 U. S. 451.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the result.