Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Alabama v. United States
Ala. v. United States, 371 U.S. 37 (1962)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1962-10-22
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “Mandatory injunctions affirmatively compelling the doing of some act, rather than 14 merely negatively forbidding continuation of a course of conduct, are a traditional tool of 15 equity.”
- “Mandatory injunctions affirmatively compelling the doing of some 23 act, rather than merely negatively forbidding continuation of a course of conduct, are a 24 1 traditional tool of equity.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alabama v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 31 opinions
371 U.S. 37 (1962)
ALABAMA ET AL.
No. 324.
ALABAMA ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 324.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided October 22, 1962. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston, Leslie Hall and Gordon Madison, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Thomas, 362 U. S. 58.