Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
In re Union Leader Corp.
368 U.S. 927
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1961-12-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- arbitrator’s remedy to be upheld in the absence of “clearly restrictive language” in the arbitration agreement
- 'Chenery applies only to “determinations specifically entrusted to an agency’s expertise,” not “legal principles” of the sort “that a court usually makes”
- whether or not trial court was correct in its conclusion that a party had engaged in misconduct, the court’s view was not unwarranted and did not indicate personal bias or prejudice
- claim of bias of trial judge was sufficiently meritorious to warrant consideration upon petition for writ of mandamus; public confidence in courts and proper administration of justice required that question be disposed of at earliest opportunity
- Letter to receiver who subsequently became the trustee
- reviewing the legislative history of the three-creditor requirement
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Union Leader Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 138 opinions
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.