Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

In re Union Leader Corp.

368 U.S. 927

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1961-12-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • arbitrator’s remedy to be upheld in the absence of “clearly restrictive language” in the arbitration agreement
  • 'Chenery applies only to “determinations specifically entrusted to an agency’s expertise,” not “legal principles” of the sort “that a court usually makes”
  • whether or not trial court was correct in its conclusion that a party had engaged in misconduct, the court’s view was not unwarranted and did not indicate personal bias or prejudice
  • claim of bias of trial judge was sufficiently meritorious to warrant consideration upon petition for writ of mandamus; public confidence in courts and proper administration of justice required that question be disposed of at earliest opportunity
  • Letter to receiver who subsequently became the trustee
  • reviewing the legislative history of the three-creditor requirement

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Union Leader Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
138 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.