Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 27 (1959)

359 U.S. 27

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1959-03-02
Topic
general

NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 27 (1959) 79 S.Ct. 607 NEW JERSEY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEWJERSEY. No. 621.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed NEW JERSEY v. UNITED STATES, 359 U.S. 27 (1959). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

NEW JERSEYv. UNITED STATES,359 U.S. 27(1959)
79 S.Ct. 607
NEW JERSEY ET AL.v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW
JERSEY.
No. 621.
Decided March 2, 1959.fn*
168 F. Supp. 324, affirmed.
David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, for appellants in No. 621.Milton T. Lasher, William A. Roberts, Irene KennedyandMaxwell A. Howellfor appellants in No. 622.Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney GeneralHansenandRobert W. Ginnanefor the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, andThomasE. DeweyandGerald E. Dwyerfor the New York Central Railroad Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.Page 28
  1. Page 27 Together with No. 622,County of Bergen et al. v.United Stateset al.,on appeal from the same court. ↩