Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Ross v. Schneckloth

Ross v. Schneckloth, 357 U.S. 575 (1958)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1958-06-30
Topic
bankruptcy

Per Curiam. The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ross v. Schneckloth. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
17 opinions
ROSSv. SCHNECKLOTH,357 U.S. 575(1958)
ROSSv. SCHNECKLOTH, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 513, Misc.
Decided June 30, 1958.fn*
Certiorari granted; judgments vacated; and cases remanded for consideration in the light ofEskridgev.Washington State PrisonBoard, ante, p. 214.

Reported below: No. 513, Misc.,51 Wn.2d 893,318 P.2d 975.
Petitionerspro se.John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, andMichael R. Alfieri, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 596, Misc.
PER CURIAM.
The motions for leave to proceedin forma pauperisand the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in light ofEskridgev.Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.Page 576
  1. Page 575 Together with No. 596, Misc.,Woodsv.Rhay, Superintendent,Washington State Penitentiary,also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same Court. ↩