Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Raley v. Ohio
Raley v. Ohio, 354 U.S. 929 (1957)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1957-06-24
- Topic
- bankruptcy
Per Curiam: The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Raley v. Ohio. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
Per Curiam:
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.
Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.