Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

350 U.S. 898

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1955-11-21
Topic: litigation

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Per Curiam: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed.* Mr. Justice Reed believes certiorari should have been denied and dissents from the judgment of reversal. Mr. Justice *899Frankfurter, Mr.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 22 opinions

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed.*

Mr. Justice Reed believes certiorari should have been denied and dissents from the judgment of reversal. Mr. Justice *899 Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that the petition for writ of certiorari should have been denied. Randolph J. Seifert and William A. Blank for petitioner. Robert M. Peet for respondent.

Amended May 14, 1956. 351 U. S. 183.