Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United States
347 U.S. 521
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1954-05-17
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that United's lease provisions violated Sec. 4 of the Sherman Act
- “it is doubtful whether sixty or sixty-four percent would be enough” of a market share to constitute a monopoly
- any share less than 50% insufficient
- defendants supplied 80% of vanadium ore
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 176 opinions
Per Curiam.
The case having been fully argued and the Court being satisfied that the findings are justified by the evidence and support the decree, the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Jackson and Mr. Justice Clark did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.