Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Acheson v. Okimura

342 U.S. 899

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1952-01-02
Topic: bankruptcy

Per Curiam: The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for specific findings as to the circumstances attending appellee’s service in the Japanese Army and voting in the Japanese elections and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. Mr. Justice Black is of. the opinion the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that the findings are adequate to show that the services' of appellee to Japan were rendered under the.compulsion *900of military and other sanctions, evidenced in some instances by physical beatings, dissents to vacation and remand.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Acheson v. Okimura. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

Per Curiam:

The judgment is vacated

and the case is remanded to the District Court for specific findings as to the circumstances attending appellee’s service in the Japanese Army and voting in the Japanese elections and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.

Mr. Justice Black is of. the opinion the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that the findings are adequate to show that the services' of appellee to Japan were rendered under the.compulsion *900 of military and other sanctions, evidenced in some instances by physical beatings, dissents to vacation and remand. Solicitor General Perlman and Howard K. Hod-dick for appellant. A. Li Wirin, Fred Okrand and Katsuo Miho for appellee.