Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Georgia Rail Road & Banking Co. v. Musgrove
335 U.S. 900
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1949-01-03
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: Redwine substituted for Musgrove as appellee. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the court below is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Mr. Justice Jackson is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Georgia Rail Road & Banking Co. v. Musgrove. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 25 opinions
Per Curiam:
Redwine substituted for Musgrove as appellee. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the court below is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it.
Mr. Justice Jackson is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.