Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Fogel v. United States

335 U.S. 865

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1948-11-15
Topic: general

Per Curiam: Upon consideration of the Government’s confession of error and the record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to va*866cate its order denying the motion for a new trial and to grant a new trial. Maury Hughes for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Fogel v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

Per Curiam:

Upon consideration of the Government’s confession of error and the record, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to va *866 cate its order denying the motion for a new trial and to grant a new trial.

Maury Hughes for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.