Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm

Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm, 313 U.S. 549 (1941)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1941-06-02
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alropa Corp. v. Kirchwehm. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443; (2) Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 357-358; (3) Kryger v. Wilson, 242 U. S. 171, 176; Tinney v. Guy, 189 U. S. 335, *550 340; Johnson v. New York Life Ins. Co., 187 U. S. 491, 496.

Mr. Sigmund H. Stéinberg for appellant. Mr. Aloys C. Link for appellee.