Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Polk Co. v. Mayo
Polk Co. v. Mayo, 299 U.S. 507 (1936)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1936-10-12
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The motion for leave to amend the statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Payne v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Polk Co. v. Mayo. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 4 opinions
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to amend the statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Payne v. Kansas, 248 U. S. 112; Arnold v. Hanna, 276 U. S. 591; cf. Sligh v. Kirkwood, 237 U. S. 52, 61, 62.