Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Via v. State Commission on Conservation & Development
296 U.S. 549
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1935-11-25
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The decree is affirmed on the ground that appellant has an adequate remedy at law. Insurance Co. v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616, 623; Grand Chute v. Winegar, 15 Wall. 373, 375, 376; Gaines v. Nicholson, 9 How. 356, 364—365; Wehrman v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Via v. State Commission on Conservation & Development. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Per Curiam:
The decree is affirmed on the ground that appellant has an adequate remedy at law. Insurance Co. v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616, 623; Grand Chute v. Winegar, 15 Wall. 373, 375, 376; Gaines v. Nicholson, 9 How. 356, 364—365; Wehrman v. Conkling, 155 U. S. 314, 326.