Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
General Construction Co. v. Fisher
295 U.S. 715
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1935-04-08
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Trinityfarm Co. v. Grosjean, 291 U. S. 466, 472; Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed General Construction Co. v. Fisher. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Trinityfarm Co. v. Grosjean, 291 U. S. 466, 472; Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514; Lucas v. Howard, 280 U. S. 526; Lucas v. Reed, 281 U. S. 699; Alward v. Johnson, 282 U. S. 509, 514; Willcuts v. Bunn, 282 U. S. 224, et seq.; Baltimore Shipbuilding Co. v. Baltimore, 195 U. S. 375, 382.