Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co.

290 U.S. 585

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1933-10-09
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

though it questioned the variance provisions under which the appellant sought a variance to operate a funeral home, it upheld the restriction prohibiting the funeral home in the first instance

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 9 opinions

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari herein is granted. On consideration of the suggestion of the respondent of a diminution of the record and of the motion for writ of certiorari to correct . the same, it is ordered that such writ be, and it is hereby, granted. It having been shown to the Court that this cause is moot (Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 651, 653—658; Jones v. Montague, 194 U.S. 147; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U.S. 528, 535, 536; Railroad Comm’n v. MacMillan, 287 U.S. 576), the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the District *586 Court with directions to vacate the orders appealed from and to dismiss the proceedings as moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216; U.S. ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. Tariff Comm’n, 274 U.S. 106, 112; Coyne v. Prouty, 289 U.S. 704.

Messrs. Rush C. Butler and Frank E. Harkness for petitioner. Messrs. Edwin M. Sims, Franklin J. Stransky, Silas H. Strawn, and John D. Black for respondents.