Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Kansas City Public Service Co. v. Ranson

285 U.S. 528

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1932-03-28
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Glenn v. Doyal, ante, p. 526; Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U. S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kansas City Public Service Co. v. Ranson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Glenn v. Doyal, ante, p. 526; Moffitt v. Kelly, 218 U. S. 400, 404, 405; Nickel v. Cole, 256 U. S. 222, 226; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Lombard v. West Chicago Park Comm’rs, 181 U. S. 33, 42, 43; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638, 639, 640; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, *529 316, 317.

Mr. Powell C. Groner, with whom Messrs. Robert W. Otto and Henry N. Ess were on the brief, for appellant. ' Messrs. Henry L. McCune and E. H. Wright were on the brief for appellee.