Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Yamhill Electric Co. v. McMinnville

Yamhill Elec. Co. v. McMinnville, 280 U.S. 531 (1930)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1930-01-20
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Yamhill Electric Co. v. McMinnville. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 9 opinions

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. Treating the papers'whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for. certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial- Code, as amended by the Act of February *532 13, 1925 (c. 229, 43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Walter L. Tooze, Jr., for appellant. Mr. John P. Kavanaugh for appellees.