Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Wick v. Superior Court

278 U.S. 575

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1928-12-10
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as ¿mended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), because the judgment sought to be reviewed is not final within the meaning of this section, however it may be regarded in state procedure; Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coates Fordney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251; Washington ex rel. McPherson *576Bros. Co. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wick v. Superior Court. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 7 opinions

Per Curiam:

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as ¿mended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), because the judgment sought to be reviewed is not final within the meaning of this section, however it may be regarded in state procedure; Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coates Fordney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251; Washington ex rel. McPherson *576 Bros. Co. v. Superior Court, 274 U. S. 726; Washington ex rel. Terry v. Superior Court, 276 U. S. 626.

Mr. Joseph D. Sullivan for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. F. G. Dorety, Frank. T. Post, Edwin C. Matthias, Charles S. Albert, and Thomas Balmer for defendants in error.