Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Ross v. South Dakota
Ross v. S.D., 271 U.S. 646 (1926)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1926-05-10
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. Dismissed. for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448; sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Farrell v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ross v. South Dakota. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Dismissed. for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448; sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671; (3) Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22; 31.