Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Maccieno v. United States

270 U.S. 629

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1926-03-01
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Mr. Rufus S. Day for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell and Mr.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Maccieno v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
Per Curiam. Mr. Rufus S. Day for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, for the United States.

Petition for certiorari granted and the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed on confession of error by the Government, with directions to remand the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for a new trial.