Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Ex parte Broussard
251 U.S. 546
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1920-02-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- amendment of Colo. Const. art. XX was expression of citizens’ dissatisfaction with supreme court’s restrictions upon powers of cities
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ex parte Broussard. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 17 opinions
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus herein denied. Mr. Frederick S. Tyler and Mr. A. D. IApscomb, for petitioners, in support of the motion. Mr. Horace Chilton in opposition to the motion.