Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Wichita Falls & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Puckett
Wichita Falls & Nw. Ry. Co. v. Puckett, 242 U.S. 619 (1916)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1916-12-18
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658, 668 et seq.; Thayer v. Spratt, 189 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wichita Falls & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Puckett. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 6 opinions
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658, 668 et seq.; Thayer v. Spratt, 189 U. S. 346, 353; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 86, 97; Kerfoot v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank, 218 U. S. 281, 288; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228., U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472. Mr. Joseph M. Bryson, Mr. Alexander Britton and Mr. Evans Browne for the plaintiff in error. Mr. C. B. Stuart, Mr. A. C. Cruce, Mr. M. K. Cruce and Mr. Weldon M. Bailey for the defendant in error.