Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Brady v. Bernard & Kittinger

217 U.S. 595

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1910-05-02
Topic: general

217 U.S. 595 (1910) BRADY v. BERNARD & KITTINGER. No. 501. Supreme Court of United States. Petition for certiorari and motion to dismiss submitted April 26, 1910.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brady v. Bernard & Kittinger. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

BRADYv. BERNARD KITTINGER,217 U.S. 595(1910)

30 S.Ct. 695

BRADYv. BERNARD KITTINGER.

APPEAL FROM, AND PETITION FOR CERTIORARI TO, THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT

OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

No. 501.

Petition for certiorari and motion to dismiss submitted April 26, 1910.

Decided May 2, 1910.

An appeal from an adjudication in bankruptcy taken under § 25a of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 dismissed because taken too late.

APPEAL from an adjudication in bankruptcy taken under § 25a of

the Bankruptcy Act.

Appellee contended in this case that the appeal came too late

as it was taken more than ten days after the order. Appellant

contended that as he had filed a petition to set aside the order

the time ran from denial of that order. The petition to set aside

was not filed until more than ten days after the adjudication.

Page 596

Mr. Norman Farrell, Jr., andMr. Hill McAlisterfor appellants.Mr. Edwin C. Brandenburg, Mr. Clarence A. Brandenburg, Mr. F.Walter Brandenburg, Mr. A.E. WilsonandMr. James R. Duffinfor appellees.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction and petition for writ of certiorari denied.