Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Moeschen v. Tenement House Department of the New York

Moeschen v. Tenement House Dep’t of the N.Y., 203 U.S. 583 (1906)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1906-11-12
Topic
general

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs. Boston Beer Company v. Massachusetts, 97 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Moeschen v. Tenement House Department of the New York. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
17 opinions

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs. Boston Beer Company v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25, 32; Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U. S. 678; United States v. Des Moines &c. Company, 142 U. S. 510, 544; Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366; Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325; case below, 89 App. Div. 526; 179 N. Y. 325. And see Health Department v. Rector &c., 145 N. Y. 32; Harrington v. Board of Aldermen, *584 20 R. I. 233; Commonwealth v. Roberts, 155 Massachusetts, 281.

Mr. Adolph Bloch for plaintiff in error. Mr. Theodore Connoly for defendant in error.