Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Gissendaner v. Bryson
136 S. Ct. 26
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2015-09-29
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- observing that the court “would have been well within its discretion to strike” the complaint because it violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(b)(2)
- “[T]here is no logical reason why there should be a readily available alternative requirement in facial challenges to lethal injection protocols but not to as-applied challenges to them.”
- “[T]here is no logical reason why there should be a readily available alternative requirement in facial challenges to lethal injection protocols but hot to as-applied challenges to them.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gissendaner v. Bryson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice THOMAS and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.