Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

RODEARMEL v. CLINTON, 09-797 (U.S. 6-7-2010)

130 S.Ct. 3384

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 2010-06-07
Topic: general

RODEARMEL v. CLINTON, 09-797 (U.S. 6-7-2010) 130 S.Ct. 3384 DAVID C. RODEARMEL v. CLINTON, SEC. OF STATE, ET AL No. 09-797 June 7, 2010.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RODEARMEL v. CLINTON, 09-797 (U.S. 6-7-2010). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RODEARMEL v. CLINTON, 09-797 (U.S. 6-7-2010)

130 S.Ct. 3384

DAVID C. RODEARMEL v. CLINTON, SEC. OF STATE, ET AL

No. 09-797

June 7, 2010.

Page 1

The District Court dismissed for lack of standing,666 F. Supp. 2d 123,127-131, and n. 10 (DC 2009), so it did not enter "any interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order upon the validity of the appointment and continuance in office of the Secretary of State under articleI, section6, clause2, of the Constitution." Joint Resolution on Compensation and Other Emoluments Attached to the Office of Secretary of State, § 1(b)(3)(A), Pub.L.110-455,122 Stat. 5036, note following5 U.S.C. § 5312. The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.Page 1