Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cruzado-Laureano v. United States

546 U.S. 1009

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 2005-11-07
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

holding that § 2000d (Title VI) proscribes only intentional discrimination and therefore does not support a disparate impact theory of recovery

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cruzado-Laureano v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 10 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.