Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Paul v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Paul v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 546 U.S. 856 (2005)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2005-10-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that police violated Edwards where an officer re-entered the interrogation room forty minutes after the suspect requested a lawyer to see if the suspect would waive his rights
- holding that police violated Edwards where officer re-entered the interrogation room forty minutes after the suspect requested a lawyer to see whether the suspect would waive his rights
- noting that “the Payne Court did not alter Booth’s holding that admitting evidence of the victims’ [family members’] opinions of the crime and of the appropriate sentence for the defendant violates the Eighth Amendment”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Paul v. Immigration & Naturalization Service. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 25 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.