Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
In Re Seaton
In Re Seaton, 538 U.S. 959 (2003)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2003-04-07
- Topic
- general
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of *960 habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Seaton. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of *960 habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
Justice Stevens dissents.See id., at 4, and eases cited therein.