Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Kowalski v. Baldwin

534 U.S. 1122

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2002-02-19
Topic
general

C. A. 9th Cir. *1123Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Kowalski v. Baldwin. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

C. A. 9th Cir. *1123 Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.