Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Doug Grant, Inc. v. Greate Bay Casino Corp.
532 U.S. 1038
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2001-05-21
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that plaintiff had no federal or New Jersey equal protection claim against casinos because they were not state actors
- “Although there are significant difficulties in applying this method, the effort is well worth the appraiser’s time.”
- “Even where the companies are not absolutely comparable, their sales prices can serve as a check on the eventual valuation placed on the business under appraisal.”
- comparisons “may be hazardous at best”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Doug Grant, Inc. v. Greate Bay Casino Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 25 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.