Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.

525 U.S. 1093

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1999-01-11
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that a motion to dismiss based on a forum selection provision should be brought pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3)
  • explaining that Rule 12(b)(3) is the appropriate vehicle for raising a motion to dismiss for improper venue on the basis of a forum selection clause
  • court declines plaintiffs invitation to become a “super-actuary,” stating that it “is clearly not equipped to become the watchdog of the insurance business”
  • motion to dismiss based on forum selection clause in international agreement should be brought under Rule 12(b)(3)
  • "Each party hereto irrevocably agrees that the courts of England shall have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute.”
  • ‘‘[i]n order to bind a [nonparty] to a forum selection clause, the party must be ‘closely related’ to the dispute such that it becomes ‘foreseeable’ that it will be bound’’
  • former employees can be “qualified individuals”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
48 opinions

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.