Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, Inc.
522 U.S. 1110
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1998-02-23
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that New Jersey's Megan's Law, which established sexual offender registration and community notification provisions, was nonpunitive and did not violate the double jeopardy or ex post facto clauses
- noting that the “act of discrimination by the employer in such a case is not the harassment, but rather the inappropriate response to the charges of harassment”
- describing sex offender registration and community notification components of New Jersey’s Megan’s Law scheme
- action implemented by employer held to be “prompt and appropriate” where “[gjiven the circumstances before it, there was little else, if anything it could do”
- New Jersey's law, which provides a tier process of imposing restrictions, was found not to violate the Ex Post Facto Clause
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 122 opinions
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.