Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Tamayo Baron v. United States

Tamayo Baron v. United States, 519 U.S. 1047 (1996)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1996-12-16
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • collecting and joining decisions from the 1st, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th Circuits
  • finding officer had reasonable suspicion because, among other reasons, the suspect’s car was too clean and contained no personal belongings
  • "[Ujnder Taylor the government may use some means, other than a jury instruction, to establish that the prior conviction resulted from a generic burglaiy.”
  • "[U]nder Taylor the government may use some means, other than a jury instruction, to establish that the prior conviction resulted from a generic burglary."
  • an evidentiary hearing is required only if the defendant’s moving papers demonstrate a colorable claim for relief
  • “nonarbitrary, but erroneous, denial” of right to counsel of choice may be subject to harmless error analysis [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • restitution under Victim and Witness Protection Act

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tamayo Baron v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
55 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.