Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Tamayo Baron v. United States
Tamayo Baron v. United States, 519 U.S. 1047 (1996)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1996-12-16
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- collecting and joining decisions from the 1st, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th Circuits
- finding officer had reasonable suspicion because, among other reasons, the suspect’s car was too clean and contained no personal belongings
- "[Ujnder Taylor the government may use some means, other than a jury instruction, to establish that the prior conviction resulted from a generic burglaiy.”
- "[U]nder Taylor the government may use some means, other than a jury instruction, to establish that the prior conviction resulted from a generic burglary."
- an evidentiary hearing is required only if the defendant’s moving papers demonstrate a colorable claim for relief
- “nonarbitrary, but erroneous, denial” of right to counsel of choice may be subject to harmless error analysis [internal quotation marks omitted]
- restitution under Victim and Witness Protection Act
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Tamayo Baron v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 55 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.