Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Gonzalez-Quezada v. United States
Gonzalez-Quezada v. United States, 520 U.S. 1281 (1997)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1997-06-16
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that district court did not have authority pursuant to § 5K2.0 to depart downward to reflect discharged state sentence
- holding that under comparable 21 U.S.C. § 853, also enacted by the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, because defendant’s continuing criminal enterprise continued after Congress' amendment to the forfeiture statute, the amended statute applies
- “Agreements to exchange cooperation for transactional immunity are governed by traditional principles of contract law ....”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Gonzalez-Quezada v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 54 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.