Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Schwartz v. Emhart Glass Machinery, Inc.

Schwartz v. Emhart Glass Mach., Inc., 520 U.S. 1257 (1997)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-06-02
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • "District judges are accorded wide discretion in ruling upon discovery motions, and appellate review is accordingly deferential."
  • “There is no federal constitutional requirement that a state appellate court conduct a comparative proportionality review.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Schwartz v. Emhart Glass Machinery, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
64 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.