Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.
Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Sec. Corp., 516 U.S. 824 (1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-10-02
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- holding that review of fees was necessary in all class action settlements to prevent both abuse of appearance and public misunderstanding
- overturning nationwide class settlement but noting that courts have certified nationwide class actions relying on capacity for court to decertify or redefine class subsequently if case becomes unmanageable
- “Although it is alleged that the officers made statements under the threat of job loss, these statements were not used against them in any criminal proceeding.”
- "[A]lthough it is alleged that the officers made statements under the threat of job loss, these statements were not used against them in any criminal proceeding."
- "One sign that a settlement may not be fair is that some segments of the class are treated differently from others.”
- describing "fiduciary responsibility" of courts in class actions
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Securities Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 113 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.