Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Pineda v. United States

516 U.S. 900

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-10-02
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • when one of Li’s codefendants in this ease claimed ineffective assistance of counsel, the court responded that such “claims are better raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255” motion

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Pineda v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
21 opinions

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.