Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp.
Exxon Chem. Pats., Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp., 518 U.S. 1020 (1996)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1996-06-24
- Topic
- intellectual-property-and-technology
How later courts describe this case
- “The claimed composition is defined as comprising — meaning containing at least — five specific ingredients”
- appellate court “properly defers” to trial court on motion for a new trial
- “Although we accept underlying fact findings unless they are clearly erroneous, ‘the determination of whether those facts satisfy the legal test of exigency is subject to de novo review.’ ”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 72 opinions
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.