Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Bynum v. State Farm Insurance
517 U.S. 1161
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1996-04-22
- Topic
- commercial
How later courts describe this case
- holding that extraction of blood to create DNA bank for certain classes of prisoners does not violate Fourth Amendment
- holding Oregon statute not in violation of Fourth Amendment or Ex Post Facto Clause
- "The extraction of blood from an individual in a simple, medically acceptable manner, despite the individual's lack of an opportunity to object to the procedure, does not implicate the Due Process Clause."
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bynum v. State Farm Insurance. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 29 opinions
Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.