Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cardona v. Florida

513 U.S. 1160

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-02-21
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • “it is not a prerequisite to application of the abuse of the writ doctrine that the petitioner have had a prior petition adjudicated on the merits”
  • “Because the presence of both a custodial setting and official interrogation is required to trigger the Miranda right-to-counsel prophylactic, absent one or the other, Miranda is not implicated.”
  • “[a] habeas court may reach the merits of a claim not raised in a previous petition only if the petitioner establishes both cause and prejudice, or shows that the fundamental miscarriage of justice, or actual innocence, exception applies.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cardona v. Florida. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
65 opinions
Distinguished
1 times

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.