Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Cardona v. Florida
513 U.S. 1160
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-02-21
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “it is not a prerequisite to application of the abuse of the writ doctrine that the petitioner have had a prior petition adjudicated on the merits”
- “Because the presence of both a custodial setting and official interrogation is required to trigger the Miranda right-to-counsel prophylactic, absent one or the other, Miranda is not implicated.”
- “[a] habeas court may reach the merits of a claim not raised in a previous petition only if the petitioner establishes both cause and prejudice, or shows that the fundamental miscarriage of justice, or actual innocence, exception applies.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cardona v. Florida. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 65 opinions
- Distinguished
- 1 times
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.