Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc.
Mitsubishi Int’l Corp. v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc., 513 U.S. 1146 (1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-02-21
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- noting that overriding purpose of Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act was "to provide consistent workers' compensation coverage to eligible longshore and harbor workers”
- finding that “Boioman should be read narrowly [such that] .... only criminal statutes, and perhaps only those relating to the Government’s power to prosecute wrongs committed against it, are exempt from the presumption” of intrater-ritoriality
- striking down as unconstitutional Colorado's Amendment 2, a voter-initiated amendment to the Colorado constitution similar to Cincinnati's Issue 3
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mitsubishi International Corp. v. Cardinal Textile Sales, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 31 opinions
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.