Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Millard Processing Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
510 U.S. 1092
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1994-01-24
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- recognizing that “it is well established that Congress may impose multiple punishments for a single crime without violating the Constitution’s double jeopardy restrictions”
- “the Board will overturn the election when [union] conduct reasonably tended to interfere with the employees’ free and uncoerced choice in the election”
- "Civil and criminal suits, by virtue of our federal system of procedure, must be filed and docketed separately”
- court did not cite Austin, and did not decide whether civil forfeiture action under § 881 was punishment because the government employed a single proceeding to prosecute the criminal and civil actions and consequently the Double Jeopardy Clause did not apply
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Millard Processing Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 85 opinions
Millard Processing Services, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board.
No. 93-682.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 24, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 8th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 2 F. 3d 258.