Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Branch v. Tunnell
512 U.S. 1219
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1994-06-20
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding motion to dismiss proper where defendant attached to motion document referred to in complaint, and that constituted core of parties' contractual relationship
- “Matters of public record may be considered, including pleadings, orders, and other papers filed with the court or records of administrative bodies.”
- Where subjective intent is an element of a plaintiffs claim, “bare allegations of improper purpose are insufficient to subject government officials to discovery and the related burdens of defending a lawsuit.”
- documents whose contents are alleged in a complaint and whose authenticity no party questions, but which are not physically attached to the pleading, may be considered in ruling on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Branch v. Tunnell. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 109 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.